Mario Genovesi, Inc. v. Feld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mario Genovesi, Inc. v. Feld

96 A.D.2d 1073, 466 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19725

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 19, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 96 A.D.2d 1073 (Mario Genovesi, Inc. v. Feld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mario Genovesi, Inc. v. Feld, 96 A.D.2d 1073, 466 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19725 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding to confirm an arbitration award, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Marbach, J.), entered June 17,1981, which granted the application. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Petitioner is a contractor whose written agreement to renovate appellant’s home contained a broad arbitration clause. In January, 1979 appellant demanded arbitration and petitioner made a cross demand. The award was in petitioner’s favor in the principal sum of $28,326.07. Appellant opposed confirmation on the ground of misconduct of the arbitrators. A review of the record supports Special Term’s conclusion that appellant’s objection was without merit. Therefore Special Term properly confirmed the award, and its judgment must be affirmed. O’Connor, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding to confirm an arbitration award, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Marbach, J.), entered June 17,1981, which granted the application. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Petitioner is a contractor whose written agreement to renovate appellant’s home contained a broad arbitration clause. In January, 1979 appellant demanded arbitration and petitioner made a cross demand. The award was in petitioner’s favor in the principal sum of $28,326.07. Appellant opposed confirmation on the ground of misconduct of the arbitrators. A review of the record supports Special Term’s conclusion that appellant’s objection was without merit. Therefore Special Term properly confirmed the award, and its judgment must be affirmed. O’Connor, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 A.D.2d 1073, 466 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mario-genovesi-inc-v-feld-nyappdiv-1983.