Mario E. Vazquez v. B & R Supermarket Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 19, 2024·No. 2024-0098·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed June 19, 2024.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D24-0098

Lower Tribunal Nos. 23-01722, 23-01723, 23-01724

Mario E. Vazquez,

Appellant,

vs.

B & R Supermarket Inc., et al., Appellees.

An Appeal from the State of Florida, Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission.

Mario E. Vazquez, in proper person.

Katie E. Sabo, Appellate Counsel (Tallahassee), for appellee Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission.

Before EMAS, SCALES, and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Ryals v. State, Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 722 So. 2d 845, 846 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) (“[W]here a claimant does not challenge the sufficiency of the [referee’s] findings, but only offers a different version of the facts, there is no legal error.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mario E. Vazquez v. B & R Supermarket Inc., (Fla. Ct. App. 2024).

Mario E. Vazquez v. B & R Supermarket Inc. (Mario E. Vazquez v. B & R Supermarket Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ryals v. STATE, UNEMPLOYMENT COM'N
722 So. 2d 845 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)