Mario Caceras v. State
Opinion
i i i i i i
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-10-00132-CR
Mario CACERAS, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2000-CR-4291 Honorable Mary D. Román, Judge Presiding
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Delivered and Filed: March 3, 2010
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
Appellant filed a notice of appeal seeking to appeal the trial court’s order denying his motion
for a judgment nunc pro tunc to correct a jail time credit issue. The denial of a motion for a
judgment nunc pro tunc is not an appealable order. See Castor v. State, 205 S.W.3d 666, 667 (Tex.
App.—Waco 2006, no pet.); see also Dooley v. State, No. 05-08-01465, 2009 WL 81917, at *1 (Tex.
App.—Dallas Jan. 14, 2009, pet. ref’d) (not designated for publication). The proper remedy to
obtain review of the denial of a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc is by petition for writ of 04-10-00132-CR
mandamus. Dooley, 2009 WL 81917, at *1; Castor, 205 S.W.3d at 667. Accordingly, this appeal
is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mario Caceras v. State (Mario Caceras v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.