Mario Caceras v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Mario Caceras v. State

DecidedMarch 3, 2010

Docket04-10-00132-CR

StatusPublished

This text of Mario Caceras v. State (Mario Caceras v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mario Caceras v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00132-CR

Mario CACERAS, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2000-CR-4291 Honorable Mary D. Román, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 3, 2010

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Appellant filed a notice of appeal seeking to appeal the trial court’s order denying his motion

for a judgment nunc pro tunc to correct a jail time credit issue. The denial of a motion for a

judgment nunc pro tunc is not an appealable order. See Castor v. State, 205 S.W.3d 666, 667 (Tex.

App.—Waco 2006, no pet.); see also Dooley v. State, No. 05-08-01465, 2009 WL 81917, at *1 (Tex.

App.—Dallas Jan. 14, 2009, pet. ref’d) (not designated for publication). The proper remedy to

obtain review of the denial of a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc is by petition for writ of 04-10-00132-CR

mandamus. Dooley, 2009 WL 81917, at *1; Castor, 205 S.W.3d at 667. Accordingly, this appeal

is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI