Mario Caceras v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 3, 2010·No. 04-10-00132-CR·Published

Opinion

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00132-CR

Mario CACERAS, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2000-CR-4291 Honorable Mary D. Román, Judge Presiding

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 3, 2010

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Appellant filed a notice of appeal seeking to appeal the trial court’s order denying his motion

for a judgment nunc pro tunc to correct a jail time credit issue. The denial of a motion for a

judgment nunc pro tunc is not an appealable order. See Castor v. State, 205 S.W.3d 666, 667 (Tex.

App.—Waco 2006, no pet.); see also Dooley v. State, No. 05-08-01465, 2009 WL 81917, at *1 (Tex.

App.—Dallas Jan. 14, 2009, pet. ref’d) (not designated for publication). The proper remedy to

obtain review of the denial of a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc is by petition for writ of 04-10-00132-CR

mandamus. Dooley, 2009 WL 81917, at *1; Castor, 205 S.W.3d at 667. Accordingly, this appeal

is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mario Caceras v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Mario Caceras v. State (Mario Caceras v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castor v. State
205 S.W.3d 666 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006)