Mario Bailey v. New Age Distributing Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided October 1, 2020·No. 19-3514·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

No. 19-3514

Mario Bailey, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

New Age Distributing Inc.

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock

Submitted: September 28, 2020 Filed: October 1, 2020 [Unpublished]

Before GRUENDER, WOLLMAN, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this collective and class action under the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Arkansas Minimum Wage Act, Mario Bailey appeals the district court’s1 adverse

1 The Honorable James M. Moody Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

grant of summary judgment in favor of his former employer. Having carefully reviewed the record and the arguments on appeal, we conclude the district court did not err in granting summary judgment. See Carmody v. Kansas City Bd. of Police Comm’rs, 713 F.3d 401, 404 (8th Cir. 2013) (reviewing de novo grant of summary judgment). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mario Bailey v. New Age Distributing Inc., (8th Cir. 2020).

Mario Bailey v. New Age Distributing Inc. (Mario Bailey v. New Age Distributing Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carmody v. Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners
713 F.3d 401 (Eighth Circuit, 2013)