MARIO BABROW v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 6, 2022·No. 22-1456·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

MARIO BABROW, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D22-1456

[October 6, 2022]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Kirk Volker, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502007CF014204AXXXMB.

Mario Babrow, Indiantown, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Chapa v. State, 159 So. 3d 361, 362 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (facts found by the judge under the Prison Releasee Reoffender Act are not elements of the offense and are within the “prior conviction” exception to Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000)).

WARNER, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MARIO BABROW v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

MARIO BABROW v. STATE OF FLORIDA (MARIO BABROW v. STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 2000)
Chapa v. State
159 So. 3d 361 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)