MARIO BABROW v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 18, 2017·No. 17-2904·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

MARIO BABROW, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2904

[October 18, 2017]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Laura Sellers Johnson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2007-CF-014204-A.

Mario Babrow, South Bay, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Galindez v. State, 955 So. 2d 517, 521-22 (Fla. 2007) (recognizing that a violation of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), can be harmless).

GERBER, C.J., TAYLOR and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MARIO BABROW v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

MARIO BABROW v. STATE OF FLORIDA (MARIO BABROW v. STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 2000)
Galindez v. State
955 So. 2d 517 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)