Mario Arteaga v. State
Opinion
jfourtlj Court of Sppeattf Antonio, Ctwas
January 22. 2014
No. 04-13-00398-CR
Mario Arteaga. Appellant
v.
The Slate of Texas, Appellee
Trial Court Case No. 12.273CR
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and has determined that oral argument will not significantly aid it in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 39.S. Therefore, all requests for oral argument are denied, and the cause is advanced for ON BRIEFS submission on February 19. 2014. to the following panel; Chief Justice Stone, Justice Angelini. and Justice Chapa. All parlies will be notified of the Court's decision in this appeal in accordance with TEX. R. API1. P. 4S.
Hither party may file a motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination that oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See TEX. R. Al'l'. P. 39.8. Such a motion should be filed within ten (10) days from the date of this order.
It is so ORDERED on January 22. 2014.
Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. have hereunto set my hand and a/fixed the seal of the said court on this January 22. 2014.
of
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mario Arteaga v. State (Mario Arteaga v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.