Marinshaw v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Marinshaw v. State

221 So. 2d 121, 284 Ala. 4, 1969 Ala. LEXIS 1006

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedApril 3, 1969

Docket4 Div. 357

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 221 So. 2d 121 (Marinshaw v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marinshaw v. State, 221 So. 2d 121, 284 Ala. 4, 1969 Ala. LEXIS 1006 (Ala. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

BLOODWORTH, Justice.

This cause is submitted on the State’s motion to strike defendant’s petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals.

The motion is due to be granted because the petition was not “filed” within fifteen days after the Court of Appeals overruled application for rehearing as required by Rule 39, Revised Rules of the Supreme Court, 279 Ala. XXI, XXXIX. It was “presented” to the Clerk the twenty-first day.

Neither does the brief accompanying the petition (required by Rule 39, supra) contain a certificate of service on the attorney general, as required by Rule 11, Revised Rules of the Supreme Court, 279 Ala. XXI, XXVII. Bruner v. State, 265 Ala. 357, 91 So.2d 224.

Motion to strike granted.

SIMPSON, MERRILL, and COLEMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI