Marinos v. Poirot
37 A.3d 154, 303 Conn. 940, 2012 Conn. LEXIS 91
This text of 37 A.3d 154 (Marinos v. Poirot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Marinos v. Poirot, 37 A.3d 154, 303 Conn. 940, 2012 Conn. LEXIS 91 (Colo. 2012).
Opinion
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 132 Conn. App. 693 (AC 33193), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that, on a Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA) claim for damages, the trial court properly entered summary judgment in favor of the defendants because the plaintiff ‘failed to produce an itemization of her claimed CUTPA damages?’ ”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Marinos v. Poirot
33 A.3d 282 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
37 A.3d 154, 303 Conn. 940, 2012 Conn. LEXIS 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marinos-v-poirot-conn-2012.