Marino v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Marino v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

899 So. 2d 505, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5539, 2005 WL 925604

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 22, 2005·No. No. 5D03-1697·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979) (holding that in the absence of an adequate record, an appellate court cannot conclude that the lower tribunal’s judgment is not supported by the evidence presented); Mason v. Load King Mfg. Co., 715 So.2d 279, 281 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), approved, 758 So.2d 649 (Fla.2000) (holding that after warning, excessive tardiness and absenteeism are grounds for denial of unemployment benefits).

GRIFFIN, THOMPSON and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979) (holding that in the absence of an adequate record, an appellate court cannot conclude that the lower tribunal’s judgment is not supported by the evidence presented); Mason v. Load King Mfg. Co., 715 So.2d 279, 281 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), approved, 758 So.2d 649 (Fla.2000) (holding that after warning, excessive tardiness and absenteeism are grounds for denial of unemployment benefits).

GRIFFIN, THOMPSON and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Marino v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 899 So. 2d 505, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5539, 2005 WL 925604 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

899 So. 2d 505 (Marino v. Unemployment Appeals Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related