Marino v. State

835 So. 2d 303, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18702, 2002 WL 31840795
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Marino v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 13184
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 20, 2002·No. No. 5D02-1320·Published

Opinion

PLEUS, J.

Victor Marino appeals an order denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus for permission to file a belated 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. The issues raised in his petition are time-barred and could or should have been raised in prior appeals. Zeigler v. State, 654 So.2d 1162 (Fla.1995). Accordingly, the trial court appropriately denie'd relief.

Marino previously filed a 3.850 motion and two 3.800 motions concerning his convictions and sentences for first degree murder and use of a firearm during a felony. These motions were denied and the denials were affirmed on appeal. We prohibit Marino from filing further pleadings concerning the above judgments and sentences unless said pleadings are signed by an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. Hastings v. State, 788 So.2d 342 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

AFFIRMED.

COBB and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marino v. State, 835 So. 2d 303, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18702, 2002 WL 31840795 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

835 So. 2d 303 (Marino v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hastings v. State
788 So. 2d 342 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Zeigler v. State
654 So. 2d 1162 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)