Marino v. Seeley

Eighth Circuit

Marino v. Seeley

440 F. App'x 518

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided December 8, 2011·No. No. 10-3685·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Brett Marino seeks to appeal from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s dismissal of his complaint against Joe Seeley. Having carefully reviewed the record, we find that Marino’s notice of appeal, filed on November 26, 2010, was untimely, as it was filed more than 30 days after the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel entered judgment on October 25, 2010, 437 B.R. 676. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A); Fed. R.App. P. 6(b)(1).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Dieser v. Cont’l Cas. Co., 440 F.3d 920, 923 (8th Cir.2006).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Brett Marino seeks to appeal from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s dismissal of his complaint against Joe Seeley. Having carefully reviewed the record, we find that Marino’s notice of appeal, filed on November 26, 2010, was untimely, as it was filed more than 30 days after the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel entered judgment on October 25, 2010, 437 B.R. 676. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A); Fed. R.App. P. 6(b)(1).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Dieser v. Cont’l Cas. Co., 440 F.3d 920, 923 (8th Cir.2006).

Marino v. Seeley, 440 F. App'x 518 (8th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

440 F. App'x 518 (Marino v. Seeley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related