Marino v. Seeley

Eighth Circuit

Marino v. Seeley

440 F. App'x 518

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedDecember 8, 2011

DocketNo. 10-3685

StatusPublished

This text of 440 F. App'x 518 (Marino v. Seeley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marino v. Seeley, 440 F. App'x 518 (8th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Brett Marino seeks to appeal from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s dismissal of his complaint against Joe Seeley. Having carefully reviewed the record, we find that Marino’s notice of appeal, filed on November 26, 2010, was untimely, as it was filed more than 30 days after the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel entered judgment on October 25, 2010, 437 B.R. 676. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A); Fed. R.App. P. 6(b)(1).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Dieser v. Cont’l Cas. Co., 440 F.3d 920, 923 (8th Cir.2006).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Brett Marino seeks to appeal from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s dismissal of his complaint against Joe Seeley. Having carefully reviewed the record, we find that Marino’s notice of appeal, filed on November 26, 2010, was untimely, as it was filed more than 30 days after the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel entered judgment on October 25, 2010, 437 B.R. 676. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A); Fed. R.App. P. 6(b)(1).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Dieser v. Cont’l Cas. Co., 440 F.3d 920, 923 (8th Cir.2006).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

440 F. App'x 518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marino-v-seeley-ca8-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack