Marino v. New York City Police Department

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Marino v. New York City Police Department

16 A.D.3d 193, 790 N.Y.S.2d 388, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2447

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 10, 2005

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 16 A.D.3d 193 (Marino v. New York City Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marino v. New York City Police Department, 16 A.D.3d 193, 790 N.Y.S.2d 388, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2447 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Frederic S. Berman, J.), entered October 14, 1997, which denied the petition and granted respondent’s cross motion to dismiss this proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent provided the pro se petitioner with certain records pursuant to his Freedom of Information Law request. Its certification that all responsive documents were disclosed, and that a diligent search was conducted for the documents it could not locate, satisfied the requirements of Public Officers Law § 89 (3) (Matter of Rattley v New York City Police Dept., 96 NY2d 873 [2001]).

We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and [194]*194find them without merit. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Williams, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Frederic S. Berman, J.), entered October 14, 1997, which denied the petition and granted respondent’s cross motion to dismiss this proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent provided the pro se petitioner with certain records pursuant to his Freedom of Information Law request. Its certification that all responsive documents were disclosed, and that a diligent search was conducted for the documents it could not locate, satisfied the requirements of Public Officers Law § 89 (3) (Matter of Rattley v New York City Police Dept., 96 NY2d 873 [2001]).

We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and [194]*194find them without merit. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Williams, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.3d 193, 790 N.Y.S.2d 388, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marino-v-new-york-city-police-department-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack