Marino v. New York City Police Department

16 A.D.3d 193, 790 N.Y.S.2d 388, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2447
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 10, 2005·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Frederic S. Berman, J.), entered October 14, 1997, which denied the petition and granted respondent’s cross motion to dismiss this proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent provided the pro se petitioner with certain records pursuant to his Freedom of Information Law request. Its certification that all responsive documents were disclosed, and that a diligent search was conducted for the documents it could not locate, satisfied the requirements of Public Officers Law § 89 (3) (Matter of Rattley v New York City Police Dept., 96 NY2d 873 [2001]).

We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and [194] find them without merit. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Williams, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marino v. New York City Police Department, 16 A.D.3d 193, 790 N.Y.S.2d 388, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2447 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

16 A.D.3d 193 (Marino v. New York City Police Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Curry v. Nassau County Sheriff's Department
69 A.D.3d 622 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)