Marino v. Marino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Marino v. Marino

256 A.D.2d 467, 683 N.Y.S.2d 427, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13456

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 16, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D.2d 467 (Marino v. Marino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marino v. Marino, 256 A.D.2d 467, 683 N.Y.S.2d 427, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13456 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County [468]*468(Staton, J.), dated April 30, 1996, which awarded custody of the parties’ infant issue to the father.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the mother’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; Fediuk v Fediuk, 173 AD2d 769). Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County [468]*468(Staton, J.), dated April 30, 1996, which awarded custody of the parties’ infant issue to the father.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the mother’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; Fediuk v Fediuk, 173 AD2d 769). Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D.2d 467, 683 N.Y.S.2d 427, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marino-v-marino-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack