Marino v. Marino

12 A.3d 1098
CourtConnecticut Appellate Court
DecidedMarch 1, 2011
Docket31512
StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.3d 1098 (Marino v. Marino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marino v. Marino, 12 A.3d 1098 (Colo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

12 A.3d 1098 (2011)
126 Conn.App. 906

Karen MARINO
v.
David MARINO.

No. 31512.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Submitted on Briefs January 10, 2011.
Decided March 1, 2011.

HARPER, BEACH and FLYNN, Js.

Prior report: 2009 WL 2602679.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant has not sustained his burden of providing us a record showing that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for a continuance. The court also did not abuse its discretion in determining the financial orders. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 A.3d 1098, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marino-v-marino-connappct-2011.