Marino v. Marino
12 A.3d 1098
This text of 12 A.3d 1098 (Marino v. Marino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Marino v. Marino, 12 A.3d 1098 (Colo. Ct. App. 2011).
Opinion
Karen MARINO
v.
David MARINO.
Appellate Court of Connecticut.
HARPER, BEACH and FLYNN, Js.
Prior report: 2009 WL 2602679.
PER CURIAM.
The defendant has not sustained his burden of providing us a record showing that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for a continuance. The court also did not abuse its discretion in determining the financial orders. The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
12 A.3d 1098, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marino-v-marino-connappct-2011.