Marino v. Brooklyn City Railroad
This text of 237 A.D. 826 (Marino v. Brooklyn City Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. The testimony relative to the occurrence of the injuries, the effect thereof, and the amount of damages rendered, create such a doubt concerning the justice of the result reached as to require a new trial in the interest of justice. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
237 A.D. 826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marino-v-brooklyn-city-railroad-nyappdiv-1932.