Marini v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Marini v. City of New York

264 A.D. 879, 35 N.Y.S.2d 507, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5223

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 264 A.D. 879 (Marini v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marini v. City of New York, 264 A.D. 879, 35 N.Y.S.2d 507, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5223 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Action by respondent to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by her as a consequence of the construction and maintenance of a dangerous road intersection in Queens county. The defendant constructed and maintained, without any warning signs of its existence, an abrupt rise in the roadway between a street and an intersecting avenue. The respondent, while a passenger in an automobile owned and driven by her husband, was bounced from the rear seat up against the roof of the car and suffered a compression fracture of the spine. Judgment for the respondent, in so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs. (Voorhees v. County of Nassau, 251 App. Div. 902; Cheney v. County of Erie, 258 id. 932.) In Robbins v. Weatherwax (246 App. Div. 654) the jury’s verdict was reinstated by the Appellate Division. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action by respondent to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by her as a consequence of the construction and maintenance of a dangerous road intersection in Queens county. The defendant constructed and maintained, without any warning signs of its existence, an abrupt rise in the roadway between a street and an intersecting avenue. The respondent, while a passenger in an automobile owned and driven by her husband, was bounced from the rear seat up against the roof of the car and suffered a compression fracture of the spine. Judgment for the respondent, in so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs. (Voorhees v. County of Nassau, 251 App. Div. 902; Cheney v. County of Erie, 258 id. 932.) In Robbins v. Weatherwax (246 App. Div. 654) the jury’s verdict was reinstated by the Appellate Division. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 A.D. 879, 35 N.Y.S.2d 507, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marini-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1942.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack