Mariner/Tampa, Ltd. v. Wells Fargo Realty Advisors Funding, Inc.

546 So. 2d 757, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1682, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3927
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 12, 1989
DocketNos. 88-00773, 88-00912
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 546 So. 2d 757 (Mariner/Tampa, Ltd. v. Wells Fargo Realty Advisors Funding, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mariner/Tampa, Ltd. v. Wells Fargo Realty Advisors Funding, Inc., 546 So. 2d 757, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1682, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3927 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal arises from a final judgment of foreclosure and a supplemental deficiency judgment pertaining to a piece of com[758]*758mercial property in downtown Tampa. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The parties, by appeal and cross-appeal, have raised a number of issues. We find merit in only one and affirm the trial court otherwise.

In the supplemental proceedings seeking a deficiency judgment it was established that the hotel in question had accumulated cash and receivables in excess of $800,000 while in receivership during foreclosure litigation. These assets were awarded to the buyer at the foreclosure sale together with the property. The buyer was a wholly owned subsidiary of the plaintiff bank and received an assignment of the final judgment prior to the sale.

In the deficiency proceedings the lower court gave credit to the defendant for one-half of the accumulated cash and receivables and entered a deficiency judgment in the amount of $72,182.71. We find no competent and substantial evidence to justify giving credit for less than the entire amount of the cash and receivables.

The appellants concede that although the award of full credit could result in a surplus (as opposed to a deficiency), the sole relief they seek is the vacating of the deficiency judgment. We therefore direct the lower court to vacate the deficiency judgment and enter a judgment in favor of the appellants Mariner/Tampa, Ltd. and Mariner Management Corporation denying a deficiency. This appeal remains pending as to the appellant/cross-appellee Archie Bennett, Jr., by reason of a bankruptcy court stay order.

CAMPBELL, C.J., and LEHAN and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rhoden v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
619 So. 2d 480 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
546 So. 2d 757, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1682, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marinertampa-ltd-v-wells-fargo-realty-advisors-funding-inc-fladistctapp-1989.