Marinemax, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA

616 F. App'x 417
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided October 6, 2015·No. 14-13492·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

After review of the record and with the benefit of oral argument by counsel for the parties, this Court affirms the district court’s February 4,2013 order (1) granting defendant National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA’s (“National Union’s”) motion for summary judgment with respect to the Regions Bank claim against plaintiff MarineMax, 1 and denying plaintiff MarineMax’s motion for summary judgment with respect to that Regions Bank claim; and (2) granting plaintiff MarineMax’s motion for - summary judgment with respect to the KeyBank claim against plaintiff MarineMax, and denying defendant National Union’s motion for summary judgment with respect to that KeyBank claim. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s final judgment that plaintiff MarineMax shall recover nothing with respect to the Regions Bank claim and shall recover $39,903.27 against defendant National Union with respect to the KeyBank claim.

AFFIRMED.

1

. Both MarineMax, Inc. ("MarineMax”) and Newcoast Financial Services, LLC (“New- ■ coast”) are plaintiffs in this action. Because Newcoast is a wholly-owned subsidiary of MarineMax and because MarineMax and Newcoast are both insureds under the insurance policy at issue, we refer to the insured plaintiffs as MarineMax throughout.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marinemax, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, 616 F. App'x 417 (11th Cir. 2015).

616 F. App'x 417 (Marinemax, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Payroll Management, Inc. v. Lexington Insurance Company
815 F.3d 1293 (Eleventh Circuit, 2016)