Marinello v. Iozzo
This text of 25 A.D.2d 679 (Marinello v. Iozzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion by respondent David
0, G-ilberg to resettle order of this court, dated December 6, 1965 granted to the extent of striking from the first paragraph thereof the words “ and no one having appeared or filed a brief for respondent Oppenheim” and by substituting therefor: “ and the action having been discontinued as to the respondent Oppenheim" In all other respects, motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 A.D.2d 679, 269 N.Y.S.2d 685, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marinello-v-iozzo-nyappdiv-1966.