Marinelli v. Oceanside Knolls, Inc.

253 A.D.2d 741, 677 N.Y.S.2d 483, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9464
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 14, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 253 A.D.2d 741 (Marinelli v. Oceanside Knolls, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marinelli v. Oceanside Knolls, Inc., 253 A.D.2d 741, 677 N.Y.S.2d 483, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9464 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the third-party defendant appeals from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DeMaro, J.), entered August 26, 1997, which is in favor of the defendant third-party plaintiff on the third-party complaint for common-law indemnification and awarded attorney’s fees and expenses in the sum of $10,270.

Ordered that the interlocutory judgment is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision awarding attorney’s fees and expenses in the sum of $10,270, and remitting the matter to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for a hearing on the amount of reasonable attorney’s fees and expenses to be awarded; as so modified, the interlocutory judgment is affirmed, with costs to the respondent.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the defendant third-party plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment on its third-party cause of action for common-law indemnification (see, Eccleston v Berakha, 233 AD2d 417; Dawson v Pavarini Constr. Co., 228 AD2d 466; Danaher v Notarfrancesco, 213 AD2d 444; McNair v Morris Ave. Assocs., 203 AD2d 433).

However, the defendant third-party plaintiff is entitled to recover its attorney’s fees and expenses incurred in defending the plaintiffs claim as part of its common-law indemnification claim (see, Eccleston v Berakha, supra). Since the reasonable[742]*742ness of the sum awarded cannot be determined on this record, the matter is remitted for a hearing on the amount of reasonable attorney’s fees and expenses to be awarded. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Charles v. Meyer
307 A.D.2d 272 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
253 A.D.2d 741, 677 N.Y.S.2d 483, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marinelli-v-oceanside-knolls-inc-nyappdiv-1998.