Marinelli v. Herman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Marinelli v. Herman

17 A.D.2d 965, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7142

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 13, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 17 A.D.2d 965 (Marinelli v. Herman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marinelli v. Herman, 17 A.D.2d 965, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7142 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to review a determination of the respondent State Rent Administrator which denied the petitioners’ application for a certificate of eviction, the petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, ICings County, entered February 23, 1962, which denied their petition and dismissed the proceeding. The application for the certificate of eviction had been made on the ground that, as a co-owner of the subject premises, the petitioner Marinelli sought in good faith the possession of the housing accommodation in question for herself and her family. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to review a determination of the respondent State Rent Administrator which denied the petitioners’ application for a certificate of eviction, the petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, ICings County, entered February 23, 1962, which denied their petition and dismissed the proceeding. The application for the certificate of eviction had been made on the ground that, as a co-owner of the subject premises, the petitioner Marinelli sought in good faith the possession of the housing accommodation in question for herself and her family. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 A.D.2d 965, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marinelli-v-herman-nyappdiv-1962.