Marinecorp International, Ltd. v. the Chopper Group, LLC and Outlaw Country, LLC

Court of Appeals of Texas

Marinecorp International, Ltd. v. the Chopper Group, LLC and Outlaw Country, LLC

DecidedJanuary 27, 2015

Docket01-14-00707-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Marinecorp International, Ltd. v. the Chopper Group, LLC and Outlaw Country, LLC (Marinecorp International, Ltd. v. the Chopper Group, LLC and Outlaw Country, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marinecorp International, Ltd. v. the Chopper Group, LLC and Outlaw Country, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Marinecorp International, Ltd. v. The Chopper Group, LLC and Outlaw Country, LLC

Appellate case number: 01-14-00707-CV

Trial court case number: 2012-23983

Trial court: 80th District Court of Harris County

The appellate record was originally due in this case on September 29, 2014. On October 8, 2014, we notified the court reporter, Michelle Tucker, that the reporter’s record had not been filed and ordered her to file the record by November 7, 2014. Nevertheless, on October 9, 2014, the reporter filed a motion for an extension of time, notifying this Court that she could file the record by October 30, 2014 and requesting that we “grant an extension until that time for filing the record.” We granted the October 9, 2014 motion on October 10, 2014. On November 13, 2014, the court reporter filed a second motion requesting an extension of time, in which she represented that the record could be filed by December 19, 2014. We granted the motion on November 17, 2014, extending the deadline for filing the reporter’s record to December 19, 2014. On January 5, 2015, the court reporter filed a third motion for extension of time. In the motion, the reporter provides no explanation of the need for an extension but nevertheless requests an additional extension of time until February 5, 2015, which is 129 days after the original deadline and 189 days after the trial court signed the judgment. We deny the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b)(1)(C) (requiring motions for extension of time to state facts relied on to reasonably explain need for extension), 35.3(c) (requiring courts to ensure that appellate record is timely filed). We order the court reporter to file the record within 21 days of the date of this order. If the record is not filed within 21 days of the date of this order, we may require the court reporter to appear and show cause why the record has not been filed. It is so ORDERED. Judge’s signature: /s/ Chief Justice Sherry Radack  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: January 27, 2015

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Marinecorp International, Ltd. v. The Chopper Group, LLC and Outlaw Country, LLC

Appellate case number: 01-14-00707-CV

Trial court case number: 2012-23983

Trial court: 80th District Court of Harris County

The appellate record was originally due in this case on September 29, 2014. On October 8, 2014, we notified the court reporter, Michelle Tucker, that the reporter’s record had not been filed and ordered her to file the record by November 7, 2014. Nevertheless, on October 9, 2014, the reporter filed a motion for an extension of time, notifying this Court that she could file the record by October 30, 2014 and requesting that we “grant an extension until that time for filing the record.” We granted the October 9, 2014 motion on October 10, 2014. On November 13, 2014, the court reporter filed a second motion requesting an extension of time, in which she represented that the record could be filed by December 19, 2014. We granted the motion on November 17, 2014, extending the deadline for filing the reporter’s record to December 19, 2014. On January 5, 2015, the court reporter filed a third motion for extension of time. In the motion, the reporter provides no explanation of the need for an extension but nevertheless requests an additional extension of time until February 5, 2015, which is 129 days after the original deadline and 189 days after the trial court signed the judgment. We deny the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b)(1)(C) (requiring motions for extension of time to state facts relied on to reasonably explain need for extension), 35.3(c) (requiring courts to ensure that appellate record is timely filed). We order the court reporter to file the record within 21 days of the date of this order. If the record is not filed within 21 days of the date of this order, we may require the court reporter to appear and show cause why the record has not been filed. It is so ORDERED. Judge’s signature: /s/ Chief Justice Sherry Radack  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: January 27, 2015

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Marinecorp International, Ltd. v. the Chopper Group, LLC and Outlaw Country, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marinecorp-international-ltd-v-the-chopper-group-l-texapp-2015.