Marine Trust Co. v. Davis

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Marine Trust Co. v. Davis

160 A. 578, 110 N.J. Eq. 424, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 798

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 16, 1932·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from overruling objections to, and ratifying and confirming the sale by the sheriff is affirmed because it appears that the property was sold for the best price obtainable at the time of sale, which price was not shown to have been grossly inadequate. Further it is not shown that there was any fraud, accident, mistake, or irregularity in the proceedings to render the sale ineffectual.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Teenchaed, Paeicee, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Yan Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from overruling objections to, and ratifying and confirming the sale by the sheriff is affirmed because it appears that the property was sold for the best price obtainable at the time of sale, which price was not shown to have been grossly inadequate. Further it is not shown that there was any fraud, accident, mistake, or irregularity in the proceedings to render the sale ineffectual.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Teenchaed, Paeicee, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Yan Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Marine Trust Co. v. Davis, 160 A. 578, 110 N.J. Eq. 424, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 798 (N.J. 1932).

Pincite

160 A. 578 (Marine Trust Co. v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.