Marine Trust Co. v. Davis
This text of 160 A. 578 (Marine Trust Co. v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order appealed from overruling objections to, and ratifying and confirming the sale by the sheriff is affirmed because it appears that the property was sold for the best price obtainable at the time of sale, which price was not shown to have been grossly inadequate. Further it is not shown that there was any fraud, accident, mistake, or irregularity in the proceedings to render the sale ineffectual.
The decree appealed from is affirmed, with costs.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Teenchaed, Paeicee, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Yan Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
160 A. 578, 110 N.J. Eq. 424, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marine-trust-co-v-davis-nj-1932.