Marine Repair Services Inc. v. Harbour Container Repair Co.
This text of 94 A.D.2d 791 (Marine Repair Services Inc. v. Harbour Container Repair Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In an action on a note in which plaintiff moved pursuant to CPLR 3213 for summary judgment in lieu of complaint, plaintiff appeals from an order of Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglas, J.), dated January 3, 1983, which denied its motion. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Defendant’s affirmative defense of fraud in the inducement is sufficiently supported by the affidavits and documents submitted by defendant in opposition to plaintiff’s motion so as to make inappropriate a grant of summary judgment at this juncture. The conclusory nature of some of the statements contained in defendant’s affidavits may be due to the fact that there has been no discovery in this case. Plaintiff may renew its motion, if it be [792]*792so advised, when discovery is completed (CPLR 3212, subd [f]; Feldman v Esikoff, 93 AD2d 807). Gibbons, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 A.D.2d 791, 462 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marine-repair-services-inc-v-harbour-container-repair-co-nyappdiv-1983.