Marine Midland Bank v. Stukey
This text of 430 N.E.2d 1318 (Marine Midland Bank v. Stukey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (75 AD2d 713). So far as the stay of execution of the judgment pending disposition of the counterclaims is concerned, under all the circumstances, we cannot say that its grant by the Appellate Division was an abuse of discretion as a matter of law (see Chrysler Corp. v Fedders Corp., 51 NY2d 953, 955).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
430 N.E.2d 1318, 55 N.Y.2d 633, 446 N.Y.S.2d 265, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marine-midland-bank-v-stukey-ny-1981.