Marine Midland Bank v. Drayer

85 A.D.2d 529, 444 N.Y.S.2d 646, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16305

This text of 85 A.D.2d 529 (Marine Midland Bank v. Drayer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marine Midland Bank v. Drayer, 85 A.D.2d 529, 444 N.Y.S.2d 646, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16305 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinions

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Cahn, J.), entered June 9,1981, granting plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment as to defendant Barry Drayer and denying such summary judgment as to defendant Robin Drayer, and denying defendants’ motion for summary judgment, is modified, on the law, to the extent that so much of said order as denies plaintiff’s motion for a further reference to hear and report on the question of further reasonable attorney’s fees due to plaintiff’s counsel, is reversed and said motion for a further reference is granted; and the claim for such further attorney’s fees as well as the claim against Robin Drayer is severed from the claim on which judgment was directed in favor of plaintiff; and the order is otherwise affirmed, without costs. Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Cahn, J.), entered June 11, 1981, in favor of plaintiff against defendant Barry Drayer, in the total amount of $126,274.94, is unanimously affirmed, without costs. The provision [530]*530of the promissory note dated April 2,1973, for attorney’s fees includes not only attorney’s fees arising from or incidental to the sale of the specific collateral but also those “arising from or incidental to the collection of any of the undersigned’s liabilities to the Bank, including this note”, i.e., it is not limited to the note. However, the judgment which has been rendered is for an amount which the bank is clearly entitled to, whether or not it is entitled to more by way of attorney’s fees. Accordingly, the judgment may be deemed a partial judgment and should be affirmed as such. Concur — Birns, J. P., Sullivan, Carro and Silverman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 A.D.2d 529, 444 N.Y.S.2d 646, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marine-midland-bank-v-drayer-nyappdiv-1981.