Marine Midland Bank, N. A. v. Green

261 A.D.2d 340, 691 N.Y.S.2d 423, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5790

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered April 8, 1998, which denied the motion of defendants to amend their answer to assert counterclaims and denied the motion of nonparty Hudson Rondout Corp., purportedly for leave to interpose counterclaims against plaintiff, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

On the prior appeal in this matter (209 AD2d 288, lv denied 85 NY2d 1029), in the course of affirming the IAS Court’s dismissal of defendants’ counterclaim for breach of an alleged oral agreement for plaintiff to extend a loan of $2 million to defendants, we expressly rejected defendants’ claim that plaintiff was estopped from asserting the Statute of Frauds as a defense to the counterclaim. We held in this connection, “[n]or would defendants be able to show the necessary element of justifiable reliance, the individual defendant as the IAS Court aptly noted, being a sophisticated real estate investor who could not have believed that plaintiff would extend a $2 million loan ‘on a word and a handshake’ while requiring a complicated set of writings for loans in far smaller amounts” (supra, at 288). Defendants and nonparty Rondout now seek to interpose counterclaims for fraud and negligent misrepresentation premised upon the identical alleged misrepresentation by plaintiff, namely, that plaintiff would extend defendants a $2 million loan. Inasmuch as we have previously held that defendants’ reliance on the alleged misrepresentation could not have been justifiable, the proposed counterclaims of defendants and nonparty Rondout, each of which entails an allegation of reasonable or justifiable reliance upon plaintiffs alleged oral promise of a $2 million loan, are not viable (see, First Natl. State Bank v Irving Trust Co., 91 AD2d 543, 544, affd 59 NY2d 991) and, accordingly, leave to amend was properly denied (see, Hauptman v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 162 AD2d 588, 589). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Mazzarelli, Rubin, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marine Midland Bank, N. A. v. Green, 261 A.D.2d 340, 691 N.Y.S.2d 423, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5790 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

261 A.D.2d 340 (Marine Midland Bank, N. A. v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

First National State Bank v. Irving Trust Co.
453 N.E.2d 1099 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
First National State Bank v. Irving Trust Co.
91 A.D.2d 543 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Hauptman v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.
162 A.D.2d 588 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v. Green
209 A.D.2d 288 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)