Marine Hospitality Corp. v. One River Plaza, Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Marine Hospitality Corp. v. One River Plaza, Co.

858 So. 2d 1224, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17063, 2003 WL 22658403

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 12, 2003

DocketNo. 4D03-2677

StatusPublished

This text of 858 So. 2d 1224 (Marine Hospitality Corp. v. One River Plaza, Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marine Hospitality Corp. v. One River Plaza, Co., 858 So. 2d 1224, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17063, 2003 WL 22658403 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Marine Hospitality Corporation timely appeals a trial court order which denied its motion to vacate a final default judgment and quash service of process in a commercial lease action. Appellant raised three points on appeal, arguing in the first point that service of process should be quashed for failure to properly perfect service on a corporation pursuant to section 48.081, Fla. Stat. (2002). Service was attempted in this case on a system administrator of the corporate defendant. Based on the confession of error as to this first point filed by appellee, One River Plaza, we reverse and remand with instructions to the trial court to quash service of process and vacate the final default judgment, without prejudice to appellee to perfect service in compliance with section 48.081, Fla. Stat.

FARMER, C.J., POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Marine Hospitality Corporation timely appeals a trial court order which denied its motion to vacate a final default judgment and quash service of process in a commercial lease action. Appellant raised three points on appeal, arguing in the first point that service of process should be quashed for failure to properly perfect service on a corporation pursuant to section 48.081, Fla. Stat. (2002). Service was attempted in this case on a system administrator of the corporate defendant. Based on the confession of error as to this first point filed by appellee, One River Plaza, we reverse and remand with instructions to the trial court to quash service of process and vacate the final default judgment, without prejudice to appellee to perfect service in compliance with section 48.081, Fla. Stat.

FARMER, C.J., POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

858 So. 2d 1224, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17063, 2003 WL 22658403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marine-hospitality-corp-v-one-river-plaza-co-fladistctapp-2003.