Marine Equities Co. v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Marine Equities Co. v. Williams

129 A.D.2d 685, 514 N.Y.S.2d 653, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45371

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 20, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 129 A.D.2d 685 (Marine Equities Co. v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marine Equities Co. v. Williams, 129 A.D.2d 685, 514 N.Y.S.2d 653, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45371 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to prohibit the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (hereinafter the DEC) from regulating a certain parcel of real property located in Richmond County, the appeal is from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Kuffner, J.), dated May 6, 1986, which, among other things (1) denied the DEC’S motion to dismiss the petition, and (2) granted the petition and barred the DEC from regulating the parcel pursuant to the Freshwater Wetlands Act (ECL art 24).

Ordered that the order and judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion to dismiss is granted (see, Matter of Wedinger v Goldberger, 129 AD2d 712 [decided herewith]). Thompson, J. P., Weinstein, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to prohibit the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (hereinafter the DEC) from regulating a certain parcel of real property located in Richmond County, the appeal is from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Kuffner, J.), dated May 6, 1986, which, among other things (1) denied the DEC’S motion to dismiss the petition, and (2) granted the petition and barred the DEC from regulating the parcel pursuant to the Freshwater Wetlands Act (ECL art 24).

Ordered that the order and judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion to dismiss is granted (see, Matter of Wedinger v Goldberger, 129 AD2d 712 [decided herewith]). Thompson, J. P., Weinstein, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 A.D.2d 685, 514 N.Y.S.2d 653, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marine-equities-co-v-williams-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack