Marine By-Products Corp. v. United States
This text of 26 Cust. Ct. 348 (Marine By-Products Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
When the protests were called for trial counsel for the plaintiff offered in evidence the special report of the appraiser in answer to each protest. Each of the said reports and the letter of the collector transmitting each protest identified the merchandise as “kelp meal.” Since both the appraiser and the collector considered the imported substance to be kelp meal, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1705 was sustained, following Centennial Flouring Mills Co. et al. v. United States (29 C. C. P. A. 264, C. A. D. 200). United States v. Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc., et al. (35 C. C. P. A. 124, C. A. D. 381) cited.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 Cust. Ct. 348, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marine-by-products-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1951.