Marine Bank & Trust Co. v. Shaffer

107 So. 516, 160 La. 755, 1926 La. LEXIS 1956
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Marine Bank & Trust Co. v. Shaffer. Read the opinion of the Court — 166 La. 164
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 1, 1926·No. No. 35259.·Published

Opinion

OVERTON, J.

This is an appeal (devolutive) from an order of court, authorizing ex-ecutory process to issue. The order was issued on two of four notes secured by mortgage. A similar order was issued, at the instance of the Bank of Houma, on the two remaining notes, secured by the same mortgage, in suit entitled Bank of Houma v. Shaffer, reported in 105 So. 79, 159 La. 1. The issues are the same in the present appeal as were those in the case cited. Hence the reasons assigned in the ease cited dispose of the present case.

For the reasons assigned in the case of the Bank of Houma v. Shaffer, cited above, the judgment appealed from is affirmed; appellant to pay the costs.

O’NIELL, C. J., is of the opinion that this appeal should be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marine Bank & Trust Co. v. Shaffer, 107 So. 516, 160 La. 755, 1926 La. LEXIS 1956 (La. 1926).

107 So. 516 (Marine Bank & Trust Co. v. Shaffer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bank of Houma v. Shaffer
105 So. 79 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1925)