Marine Amazon Construction Company
This text of Marine Amazon Construction Company (Marine Amazon Construction Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
Appeal of -- ) ) Marine Amazon Construction Company ) ASBCA No. 60658 ) Under Contract No. W919QA-11-C-0076 )
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Mr. Shiraqa Raoufi President
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. Army Chief Trial Attorney MAJ Julie A. Glascott, JA Trial Attorney
OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE STEMPLER ON THE GOVERNMENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS
STATEMENT OF FACTS FOR PURPOSES OF THE MOTION
On 1July2016, appellant filed a notice of appeal with the Board, seeking payment under the contract. The appeal was docketed as ASBCA No. 60658. On 4 August 2016, the government moved to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, alleging that appellant did not submit a claim to the contracting officer prior to filing the appeal. The government's motion provided appellant with the address of the contracting officer if appellant wished to file a claim. In a 9 September 2016 email to the Board, appellant stated, in part, that "[w ]e are agree with your office for motion, and also please let the contracting officer maker her decision."
By order dated 14 September 2016, the Board directed appellant to clarify whether it concurred with the government's motion and that it desired to submit a claim to the contracting officer. In an email dated 22 September 2016, appellant responded that it had submitted a certified claim to the contracting officer on 19 July 2016 but did not receive a decision. The Board treated this correspondence as a notice of appeal from the contracting officer's failure to issue a final decision on appellant's alleged 19 July claim, and docketed the appeal as ASBCA No. 60814 on 26 September 2016.
The Board's jurisdiction under the Contract Disputes Act is dependent upon the contractor's submission of a proper claim to the contracting officer for a final decision. 41U.S.C.§7103(a); CCIE & Co., ASBCA Nos. 58355, 59008, 14-1BCAii35,700 at 174,816. Appellant has conceded that it did not submit a claim to the contracting officer prior to filing this appeal. Thus, the Board lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate the appeal. This appeal is dismissed without prejudice to the prosecution of ASBCA No. 60814.
Dated: 4 October 2016
I concur
1fVL RICHARD SHACKLEFORD Administrative Judge ive Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals of Contract Appeals
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60658, Appeal of Marine Amazon Construction Company, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
Dated:
JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Marine Amazon Construction Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marine-amazon-construction-company-asbca-2016.