Marincic v. Long Island Rail Road
229 N.E.2d 225, 20 N.Y.2d 676, 282 N.Y.S.2d 546, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1370
This text of 229 N.E.2d 225 (Marincic v. Long Island Rail Road) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Marincic v. Long Island Rail Road, 229 N.E.2d 225, 20 N.Y.2d 676, 282 N.Y.S.2d 546, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1370 (N.Y. 1967).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs. (See Davis v. Long Is. R. R. Co., 301 N. Y. 450.) No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Van Voorhis, Burke, Keating and Breitel. Judges Scileppi and Bergan dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that no actionable negligence has been established against defendant railroad.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Davis v. Long Island Rail Road
95 N.E.2d 700 (New York Court of Appeals, 1950)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
229 N.E.2d 225, 20 N.Y.2d 676, 282 N.Y.S.2d 546, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marincic-v-long-island-rail-road-ny-1967.