Marinace v. Marinace

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Marinace v. Marinace

51 A.D.2d 770, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11337

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 17, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 770 (Marinace v. Marinace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marinace v. Marinace, 51 A.D.2d 770, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11337 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

—The respective attorneys for the parties on this appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered November 7, 1975, have agreed, after a conference held before Hon. Harry Gittleson on January 5, 1976, that the appeal be withdrawn, and they thereupon signed a memorandum to such effect, which memorandum reflects the suggestion by Hon. Harry Gittleson, made at the said conference, that respondent refrain from communicating with the appellant’s present or past employers, directly or indirectly, without prejudice, however, to the right of her attorneys, or their agents, to have such communication with said present or past employers. In accordance with the foregoing, the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—The respective attorneys for the parties on this appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered November 7, 1975, have agreed, after a conference held before Hon. Harry Gittleson on January 5, 1976, that the appeal be withdrawn, and they thereupon signed a memorandum to such effect, which memorandum reflects the suggestion by Hon. Harry Gittleson, made at the said conference, that respondent refrain from communicating with the appellant’s present or past employers, directly or indirectly, without prejudice, however, to the right of her attorneys, or their agents, to have such communication with said present or past employers. In accordance with the foregoing, the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 770, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marinace-v-marinace-nyappdiv-1976.