Marin v. The People's Republic of China

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MEL MARIN, Case No.: 25-cv-1409-RSH-VET

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION 13 v. 14 THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA dba DONGGUAN AIBOKESI 15 NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD 16 dba CIRCOOTER SCOOTER, 17 Defendants. 18 19 On July 18, 2025, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis 20 and dismissed his Complaint with leave to amend. ECF No. 6 at 4. The Court set a deadline 21 for Plaintiff to file a First Amended Complaint to no later than July 31, 2025. Id. The Court 22 advised Plaintiff that failure to comply with this deadline would result in the dismissal of 23 his action. Id. To date, Plaintiff has neither filed a First Amended Complaint or otherwise 24 responded to the Court’s Order. See Docket. 25 For the reasons above, the Court DISMISSES this action without prejudice. See Lira 26 v. Herrera, 427 F.3d 1164, 1169 (9th Cir. 2005) (“If a plaintiff does not take advantage of 27 the opportunity to fix his complaint, a district court may convert the dismissal of 28 1 complaint into dismissal of the entire action.”). The Clerk of Court is directed to close 2 || the case. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 1, 2025 Fobut C / , 8

6 Hon. Robert S. Huie United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28