Marin v. Owen
This text of Marin v. Owen (Marin v. Owen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6052
JOSE MARIN,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
JOHN R. OWEN, Warden,
Respondent – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:08-cv-01644-TLW)
Submitted: July 7, 2009 Decided: July 21, 2009
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jose Marin, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Jose Marin, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006)
petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Marin v. Owen, No. 4:08-cv-01644-TLW (D.S.C.
Dec. 12, 2008). Although we grant Marin’s motion to amend his
informal brief, we dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Marin v. Owen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marin-v-owen-ca4-2009.