Marin v. Owen

Fourth Circuit

Marin v. Owen

328 F. App'x 890

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 21, 2009·No. No. 09-6052·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jose Marin, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Ac[891] cordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Marin v. Owens, No. 4:08-cv-01644-TLW, 2008 WL 5235866 (D.S.C. Dec. 12, 2008). Although we grant Marin’s motion to amend his informal brief, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jose Marin, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Ac[891] cordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Marin v. Owens, No. 4:08-cv-01644-TLW, 2008 WL 5235866 (D.S.C. Dec. 12, 2008). Although we grant Marin’s motion to amend his informal brief, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Marin v. Owen, 328 F. App'x 890 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

328 F. App'x 890 (Marin v. Owen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related