Marin v. McManus

Fourth Circuit

Marin v. McManus

589 F. App'x 158

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 7, 2015

DocketNo. 14-1893

StatusPublished

This text of 589 F. App'x 158 (Marin v. McManus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marin v. McManus, 589 F. App'x 158 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mel Marin seeks to appeal the district court’s order directing him to provide completed service forms and summons and the court’s order dismissing his civil complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with its instructions. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Marin v. McManus, No. 1:14— cv-02014-RDB (D. Md. filed June 30, 2014 & entered July 1,. 2014; July 31, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mel Marin seeks to appeal the district court’s order directing him to provide completed service forms and summons and the court’s order dismissing his civil complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with its instructions. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Marin v. McManus, No. 1:14— cv-02014-RDB (D. Md. filed June 30, 2014 & entered July 1,. 2014; July 31, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

589 F. App'x 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marin-v-mcmanus-ca4-2015.