Marin v. LaSalle National Bank, N.A.

37 F. App'x 314
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 13, 2002·No. No. 01-17237; D.C. No. CV-01-00050-RCC·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM**

Mel A. Marin appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment for LaSalle National Bank and others alleging breach of contract, violation of the National Bank Act, and violation of the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Relief Act in connection with the handling of a mortgage. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the district court’s summary judgment de novo, Del E. Webb McQueen Dev. Corp. v. Resolution Trust Corp., 69 F.3d 355, 358 (9th Cir.1995), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment to Defendants on all claims because Marin is not a party to the con[315] tract under which he seeks redress. See 12 U.S.C. § 86; 50 App.U.S.C. §§ 526, 581; Leal v. Allstate Ins. Co., 199 Ariz. 250, 17 P.3d 95, 99 (Ariz.Ct.App.2000); Echols v. Beauty Built Homes, Inc., 132 Ariz. 498, 647 P.2d 629, 631 (Ariz.1982).

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marin v. LaSalle National Bank, N.A., 37 F. App'x 314 (9th Cir. 2002).

37 F. App'x 314 (Marin v. LaSalle National Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Echols v. Beauty Built Homes, Inc.
647 P.2d 629 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1982)
Leal v. Allstate Insurance
17 P.3d 95 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2000)