Marin Construction Corp. v. 62 Holding Corp.

87 A.D.2d 547, 448 N.Y.S.2d 175, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15785
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 18, 1982·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Order of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kent, J.), entered August 31, 1981, which granted defendant a default judgment on its counterclaims and severed them, setting them down for an inquest, is reversed, to the extent appealed from, without costs, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, and the motion denied. The court’s decision was specifically based upon a two-day lateness by plaintiff in replying to defendant’s counterclaims. [548]*548In view of the desirability of having cases determined on their merits, such a strict, overly technical application of statutory time periods is misplaced where no prejudice has been demonstrated and where defendant’s acceptance and retention of plaintiff’s reply for approximately 10 months prior to its motion for summary judgment can be deemed to constitute a waiver of its right to complain about the late service. (Nagel v Sonnenberg, 74 AD2d 565; Maunz v Laube, 60 AD2d 970.) Concur —• Murphy, P. J., Sandler, Lupiano, Bloom and Milonas, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marin Construction Corp. v. 62 Holding Corp., 87 A.D.2d 547, 448 N.Y.S.2d 175, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15785 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

87 A.D.2d 547 (Marin Construction Corp. v. 62 Holding Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Round Hill Music, LP v. Simmons
2024 NY Slip Op 30481(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)