Marilyn Tindol v. Gary Phillip Tindol
This text of Marilyn Tindol v. Gary Phillip Tindol (Marilyn Tindol v. Gary Phillip Tindol) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-10-00507-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
MARILYN TINDOL, Appellant,
v.
GARY PHILLIP TINDOL, Appellees.
On appeal from the 36th District Court of Live Oak County, Texas.
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
This case is before the Court on appellant’s agreed motion to set aside the trial
court’s judgment without regard to the merits and remand to the trial court for rendition of
judgment. The parties have reached an agreement with regard to the disposition of the
matters currently on appeal. Pursuant to agreement, the parties request this Court to set aside the trial court=s judgment without regards to the merits, and remand this case to the
trial court for rendition of a judgment in accordance with the agreement of the parties.
The joint motion to set aside and remand is GRANTED. Accordingly, we SET
ASIDE the trial court=s judgment without regard to the merits, and REMAND this case to
the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties= agreement. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P.
42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 6th day of October, 2011.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Marilyn Tindol v. Gary Phillip Tindol, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marilyn-tindol-v-gary-phillip-tindol-texapp-2011.