Marilyn Stewart v. Warren Properties, Inc.,Agent for Vineyard Garden Apartments

Court of Appeals of Texas

Marilyn Stewart v. Warren Properties, Inc.,Agent for Vineyard Garden Apartments

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 2, 2013·No. 04-13-00141-CV·Published

Opinion

jfourtl) Court of

December 2. 2013

Nu. 04-13-00141-CV

Marilyn Stewart. Appellant

v.

Warren Properties. Inc.. Agent For Vineyard Garden Apartments. Appellee

Trial Court Case No. 383509

() RDER

The Court has reviewed the record and brief's in this appeal and has determined that oral argument will not significantly ait! it in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See Tex. R. APP. P. 39.8. Therefore, all requests for oral argument arc denied, and the cause is advanced for ON BRIEFS submission on January S. 2014, to the following panel: Chief Justice Stone. Justice Angelini, and Justice Chapa. All parlies will he notified of the Court's decision in this appeal in accordance with TEX. R. App. 1J. 48.

Either party may file a motion requesting the Court to reconsider ils determination thai oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See TEX. K. API1.1'. 39.8. Such a motion should be filed within ten (10) days from the date ofthis order.

It is so ORDERED on December 2, 2013.

atherina'Stone. Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF uive hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the sai aid

court on this December 2. 2013.

c-itn E./Iotlk. Clerk s o/

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

jfourtl) Court of

December 2. 2013

Nu. 04-13-00141-CV

Marilyn Stewart. Appellant

v.

Warren Properties. Inc.. Agent For Vineyard Garden Apartments. Appellee

Trial Court Case No. 383509

() RDER

The Court has reviewed the record and brief's in this appeal and has determined that oral argument will not significantly ait! it in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See Tex. R. APP. P. 39.8. Therefore, all requests for oral argument arc denied, and the cause is advanced for ON BRIEFS submission on January S. 2014, to the following panel: Chief Justice Stone. Justice Angelini, and Justice Chapa. All parlies will he notified of the Court's decision in this appeal in accordance with TEX. R. App. 1J. 48.

Either party may file a motion requesting the Court to reconsider ils determination thai oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See TEX. K. API1.1'. 39.8. Such a motion should be filed within ten (10) days from the date ofthis order.

It is so ORDERED on December 2, 2013.

atherina'Stone. Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF uive hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the sai aid

court on this December 2. 2013.

c-itn E./Iotlk. Clerk s o/

Marilyn Stewart v. Warren Properties, Inc.,Agent for Vineyard Garden Apartments, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Marilyn Stewart v. Warren Properties, Inc.,Agent for Vineyard Garden Apartments (Marilyn Stewart v. Warren Properties, Inc.,Agent for Vineyard Garden Apartments) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.