Marilyn McKeithan v. Bradford Condit

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 1, 2016
Docket13-16-00348-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Marilyn McKeithan v. Bradford Condit (Marilyn McKeithan v. Bradford Condit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marilyn McKeithan v. Bradford Condit, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-16-00348-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

MARILYN MCKEITHAN, Appellant,

v.

BRADFORD CONDIT, Appellee.

On appeal from the 117th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria Per Curiam Order

On July 1, 2016, appellant, Marilyn McKeithan, filed a “Motion to Stay” requesting

this Court to stay the trial court proceedings pending resolution of her appeal from the

trial court’s final judgment that her property at 5401 Flynn Parkway, Corpus Christi, Texas

78411 is not exempt from execution and/or levy. The Court received a response to the motion to stay from appellee, Bradford M. Condit. Appellee opposes the motion to stay

in all respects.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion to stay and the

response thereto, is of the opinion that the motion to stay should be granted. The motion

is GRANTED insofar as execution of the final judgment and pending sheriff’s sale are

ordered stayed pending resolution of this appeal or further order of the Court. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 43.6.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 1st day of July, 2016.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Marilyn McKeithan v. Bradford Condit, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marilyn-mckeithan-v-bradford-condit-texapp-2016.