Marilyn McKeithan v. Bradford Condit
This text of Marilyn McKeithan v. Bradford Condit (Marilyn McKeithan v. Bradford Condit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-16-00348-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
MARILYN MCKEITHAN, Appellant,
v.
BRADFORD CONDIT, Appellee.
On appeal from the 117th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.
ORDER
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria Per Curiam Order
On July 1, 2016, appellant, Marilyn McKeithan, filed a “Motion to Stay” requesting
this Court to stay the trial court proceedings pending resolution of her appeal from the
trial court’s final judgment that her property at 5401 Flynn Parkway, Corpus Christi, Texas
78411 is not exempt from execution and/or levy. The Court received a response to the motion to stay from appellee, Bradford M. Condit. Appellee opposes the motion to stay
in all respects.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion to stay and the
response thereto, is of the opinion that the motion to stay should be granted. The motion
is GRANTED insofar as execution of the final judgment and pending sheriff’s sale are
ordered stayed pending resolution of this appeal or further order of the Court. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 43.6.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 1st day of July, 2016.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Marilyn McKeithan v. Bradford Condit, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marilyn-mckeithan-v-bradford-condit-texapp-2016.