Marilyn McCollom v. Newcor Ventures, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 3, 2018
Docket01-17-00900-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Marilyn McCollom v. Newcor Ventures, Inc. (Marilyn McCollom v. Newcor Ventures, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marilyn McCollom v. Newcor Ventures, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Marilyn McCollom v. Newcor Ventures, Inc.

Appellate case number: 01-17-00900-CV

Trial court case number: 1095606

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 2 of Harris County

Appellant, Marilyn McCollum, has filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s final judgment in a forcible detainer proceeding. The judgment awards possession of the property at issue to appellee, Newcor Ventures, Inc.; provides that “a writ of possession may issue on or after January 5, 2018”; and sets a supersedeas bond in the amount of $24,000.00. On December 29, 2017, McCollom filed an “Emergency Motion to Stay Eviction Order and Posting of Supersedeas Bond.” She asks that we “stay the execution of the eviction or payment of the supersedeas bond.” We deny McCollom’s motion. See TEX. P ROP. CODE ANN. § 24.007 (Vernon Supp. 2017) (“A judgment of a county court may not under any circumstances be stayed pending appeal unless, within 10 days of the signing of the judgment, the appellant files a supersedeas bond in an amount set by the county court.”); TEX. R. CIV. P. 510.13 (“The judgment of the county court may not be stayed unless within 10 days from the judgment the appellant files a supersedeas bond in an amount set by the county court pursuant to Section 24.007 of the Texas Property Code.”); see also Hernandez v. U.S. Bank Trust N.A. as Trustee for LSF8 Master Participation Trust, 527 S.W.3d 307, 310 (Tex. App.— El Paso 2017, no pet.); Guillen v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 494 S.W.3d 861, 865 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 2016, no pet.) It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: January 3, 2018

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rudy Guillen v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
494 S.W.3d 861 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Marilyn McCollom v. Newcor Ventures, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marilyn-mccollom-v-newcor-ventures-inc-texapp-2018.