Marilyn Martin v. Midfirst Bank
This text of Marilyn Martin v. Midfirst Bank (Marilyn Martin v. Midfirst Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-13-00445-CV
MARILYN MARTIN APPELLANT
V.
MIDFIRST BANK APPELLEE
----------
FROM THE 67TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION1
On December 16, 2013, we notified Appellant Marilyn Martin that this
appeal was subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction because her notice of
appeal was due April 19, 2013, but was not filed until December 4, 2013. See
Tex. R. App. P. 26.1; Howlett v. Tarrant Cnty., 301 S.W.3d 840, 843 (Tex. App.—
Fort Worth 2009, pet. denied) (“A timely-filed notice of appeal confers jurisdiction
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. on this court, and absent a timely filed notice of appeal, we must dismiss the
appeal.”). Martin responded to our letter, but her response does not show
grounds for continuing the appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want
of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.
DELIVERED: January 16, 2014
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Marilyn Martin v. Midfirst Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marilyn-martin-v-midfirst-bank-texapp-2014.