Marilyn Froling Revocable Living Trust v. Bloomfield Hills Country Club
772 N.W.2d 52, 485 Mich. 880
Opinion
MARILYN FROLING REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BLOOMFIELD HILLS COUNTRY CLUB, Donald Dreyfuss, Elisa Dreyfuss, Mary D. Bright Trust, Nancy R. Vlasic Revocable Living Trust, John Rakolta, Jr., Terry Rakolta, and Thomas Varbedian, Defendants, and
Alan Kiriluk, Marilynne Kiriluk, Roger B. Smith, Barbara Smith, Gregg Williams, Cindi Williams, and City of Bloomfield Hills, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 9, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, C.J., and MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and HATHAWAY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marilyn Froling Revocable Living Trust v. Bloomfield Hills Country Club, 772 N.W.2d 52, 485 Mich. 880 (Mich. 2009).
772 N.W.2d 52 (Marilyn Froling Revocable Living Trust v. Bloomfield Hills Country Club) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tyree v. MASTERS HOME IMPROVEMENT AND DESIGN, INC.
772 N.W.2d 52 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2009)