Mariki Donnel Earl v. Sohail R. Siddiqui, Lupin Pharmaceuticals Inc, Sam Pharmacy

Opinion

Opinion issued June 23, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket

No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). Further, appellant has not paid or made

arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P.

37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did

not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of

prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Lloyd.

Footnotes

1. NO. 01-16-00283-CV ——————————— MARIKI DONNEL EARL, Appellant V. SOHAIL R. SIDDIQUI, LUPIN PHARMACEUTICALS INC, SAM’S PHARMACY, Appellees On Appeal from the 268th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 14-DCV-216215 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Mariki Donnel Earl, has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a) (West 2013), 101.041 (West Supp. 2015); Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts