Marietta Washington v. United States of America and Clara Washington

Sixth Circuit

Marietta Washington v. United States of America and Clara Washington

209 F.2d 258

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedDecember 18, 1953

Docket11842_1

StatusPublished

This text of 209 F.2d 258 (Marietta Washington v. United States of America and Clara Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marietta Washington v. United States of America and Clara Washington, 209 F.2d 258 (6th Cir. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause has been heard and considered on the oral arguments and briefs of the parties and on the entire record in the case;

And it appearing that the district court held appellee Clara Washington, mother of the deceased, to be the direct beneficiary of her soldier son’s $10,000 National Service Life Insurance Policy and his wife, appellant Marietta Washington, as having no interest therein;

And it appearing tiiat the findings of fact of the district judge are supported by substantial evidence and are not clearly erroneous and that his conclusions of law are correctly drawn;

The judgment of the district court is ordered to be and is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause has been heard and considered on the oral arguments and briefs of the parties and on the entire record in the case;

And it appearing that the district court held appellee Clara Washington, mother of the deceased, to be the direct beneficiary of her soldier son’s $10,000 National Service Life Insurance Policy and his wife, appellant Marietta Washington, as having no interest therein;

And it appearing tiiat the findings of fact of the district judge are supported by substantial evidence and are not clearly erroneous and that his conclusions of law are correctly drawn;

The judgment of the district court is ordered to be and is hereby affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 F.2d 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marietta-washington-v-united-states-of-america-and-clara-washington-ca6-1953.