Marie Stevens v. Dow Corning Corporation
This text of Marie Stevens v. Dow Corning Corporation (Marie Stevens v. Dow Corning Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion Granted; Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 4, 2013.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-13-00191-CV
MARIE STEVENS, Appellant
V.
DOW CORNING CORPORATION, CHRIS ROBINSON MD, JAMES R. CULLINGTON MD, FRANCIS BURTON MD, SIMON FREDERICKS MD, TOLBERT WILKINSON MD, 21 INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS FKA KNOLL INTERNATIONAL, MILTON ROWLEY MD, WESLEY WASHBURN MD, PRESTON CHANDLER MD, WILSHIRE FOAM PRODUCTS INC., ERNEST CRONIN MD, JAMES PETERSON MD, FRANK J. GEROW MD, THOMAS CRONIN MD, BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, Appellees
On Appeal from the 61st District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1992-25394EM
MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an appeal from an order signed January 29, 2013. On March 26, 2013, appellant filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Frost, Brown, and Busby.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Marie Stevens v. Dow Corning Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marie-stevens-v-dow-corning-corporation-texapp-2013.