Marie Saunders v. United States

D.C. Circuit

Marie Saunders v. United States

286 F.2d 823, 109 U.S. App. D.C. 266, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 5477

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJanuary 26, 1961

Docket16022_1

StatusPublished

This text of 286 F.2d 823 (Marie Saunders v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marie Saunders v. United States, 286 F.2d 823, 109 U.S. App. D.C. 266, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 5477 (D.C. Cir. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

286 F.2d 823

109 U.S.App.D.C. 266

Marie SAUNDERS, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 16022.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Jan. 17, 1961.
Decided Jan. 26, 1961.

Mr. J. E. Bindeman, Washington, D.C. (appointed by this Court) for appellant.

Mr. Daniel J. McTague, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U.S. Atty. and Carl W. Belcher, Asst. U.S. Atty., were on the brief, for appellee. Mr. Frank Q. Nebeker, Asst. U.S. Atty., also entered an appearance for appellee.

Before Mr. Justice REED, retired,1 WILBUR K. MILLER, Chief Judge, and BURGER, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Having been convicted of violating the narcotics statutes, Marie Saunders appeals. We have examined her assignments of prejudicial error and find them without substance.

Affirmed.

1

Sitting by designation pursuant to Sec. 294(a), Title 28 U.S.C

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI